The Hero’s Journey

February 1st, 2010

“By drawing parallels between things and other, entirely different things, I not only further my own studies, but also encourage young minds to develop this comparative methodology in their own work,” said Windham, holding his left hand up to represent one thing, then holding his right hand up to represent a separate thing, then bringing his hands together in simulation of a hypothetical synthesis of the two things. “It’s not just similarities that are important, though—the differences between things are also worth exploring at length.”

Professor Sees Parallels Between Things, Other ThingsThe Onion 5-16-07

Joseph Campbell interprets myth, compellingly, as metaphor referring to inner experience; secular scholars like Ralph Ellis (and religious fundamentalists), as referring to outer, historical experience.  But such narratives are multivalent enough to cover either terrain, and a given myth will, at different times and places, and for different folks, mean different things, including, most problematically, whatever those in power at the time want it to mean.  To me, Campbell is rad for elucidating how myth can be of use, indeed empowering, to the modern individual and for laying out the structural features of mythological narrative.  As readers of this blog well know, any schmuck can find parallels or resonances between stuff and other stuff; determining the practical significance of such parallels and drawing coherent conclusions from them remains a whole other thimble of tardigrades.

Dig Campbell’s characterization of evil at 7:38,

What a wonderful power the machine gives you, but is it going to dominate you?  This statement of what the need and want is must come from you; not from the machine, and not from the government that’s teaching you; or not even from the clergy.  It has to come from one’s own inside, and the minute you let that drop and take what the dictation of the time is, instead of the dictation of your own eternity, you have capitulated to the devil.  And you’re in hell.

Follow your bliss and cuídate.

Kage Baker died.

January 31st, 2010

Kage Baker died this morning.  She had uterine cancer, which spread to her brain.

Having read only one of Baker’s books, last year’s The Empress of Mars, I feel perfectly comfortable stating that the woman knew how to write SF.

Adios, Kage!

Have fun and cuídate.

J.D. Salinger died.

January 28th, 2010

Want to cruise to literary stardom on a handful of stories and (what I’d call) novellas, and live to 91?  Here’s the formula:

Mr. Salinger was controlling and sexually manipulative, Ms. Maynard wrote, and a health nut obsessed with homeopathic medicine and with his diet (frozen peas for breakfast, undercooked lamb burger for dinner). Ms. Salinger said that her father was pathologically self-centered and abusive toward her mother, and to the homeopathy and food fads she added a long list of other enthusiasms: Zen Buddhism, Vedanta Hinduism, Christian Science, Scientology and acupuncture. Mr. Salinger drank his own urine, she wrote, and sat for hours in an orgone box.

J. D. Salinger, Literary Recluse, Dies at 91” by Charles McGrath, NYT 1-28-10

Adios, J.D.!  Thanks to Deanna for cluing me in.

Have fun and cuídate.

Ursula Le Guin vs. Google

January 25th, 2010

Now that Google has declared war on China, can it take on a diminutive 80-year-old science-fiction and fantasy author? Probably, but Ursula K. Le Guin is not going down without a fight. It all started when the formidable author of the classic Earthsea novels and, most recently, the Virgil-inspired Lavinia, resigned her long membership in the Authors Guild over the group’s support of the Google settlement on copyrighted material; that letter here. Le Guin is also trying to enlist as many writers as she can to oppose what she calls the Google Putsch.

Will The Google Settlement Leave Ursula Le Guin Dispossessed?” by Scott Timberg, io9 1-25-09

The Google Putsch!

May it fail like its namesake.

From the 18th, Here’s Le Guin and Margaret Killjoy.

The whole thing’s inspiring and worth a view (Le Guin reads from The Dispossessed and Always Coming Home, Killjoy presents re: anarchist fiction, they both answer questions) but at around 57 min., Le Guin pitches her petition and talks copyright briefly.

Can’t say I’m surprised by any of it – Google’s been one of the most wretched boils on the arse of the infoscape for, what, over eleven years now?  Anyhow, for whatever good it all does, the Laboratorium remains on top of it.

Unfuck Google, have fun and cuídate.

UPDATE, 2-5-10

Odd couple?  Webster Tarpley schools this RT talking head (though props, once again, to RT for even going there in the first place) on Spookle’s sordid origins,

and Steve Watson sums the situation up nicely at Prison Planet.  We’ll see how the book settlement shit shakes out on the 18th.

Conspiracy Theories: Causes and Cures

January 24th, 2010

Declare the past, diagnose the present, foretell the future ; practise these acts. As to diseases, make a habit of two things–to help, or at least to do no harm.

Hippocrates, Epidemics I, Part XI, W.H.S. Jones trans.

“There’s no conspiracy.”

Jonathan Wilde in Ken MacLeod’s conspiracy-filled Fall Revolution series

Let us never tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories concerning the attacks of September the 11th – malicious lies that attempt to shift the blame away from the terrorists themselves, away from the guilty.

George W. Bush to UN General Assembly, 11-10-01

This can of worms has really made the rounds since Marc Estrin opened it (I caught it over at Cryptogon).  Basically, for the thoroughly modern malady of conspiracy theoryitis, OIRA’s Sunstein and co-author Vermeule prescribe… wait for it… conspiracy!

I have to admit, the dudes occasionally raise some interesting points.  For instance, I can recall (wonder how many of my fellow conspiracy geeks can say the same?) the transformative fury I felt upon learning of the Santa conspiracy.  I didn’t know to call it that at the time, but learning I’d been systematically lied to by my parents, and that such deception was no big deal to them, nor to any of the other adults with whom I raised the issue, led me to question  for the first time the religion in which I’d been raised – a path leading to the jovial cynicism I’ve enjoyed (with but the infrequent hiccup of outrage/indignation) for the past decade.  Thanks, Mom & Dad!

Not all false conspiracy theories are harmful; consider the false conspiracy theory, held by many of the younger members of our society, that a secret group of elves, working in a remote location under the leadership of the mysterious “Santa Claus,” make and distribute presents on Christmas Eve. This theory is false, but is itself instilled through a widespread conspiracy of the powerful – parents – who conceal their role in the whole affair. (Consider too the Easter Bunny and the Tooth Fairy.) It is an open question whether most conspiracy theories are equally benign; we will suggest that some are not benign at all.

Sunstein & Vermeule, “Conspiracy Theories” 1-15-08, pg. 5

Cass and Adrian want you to know that they know that, like, not all conspiracy theories are wrong or harmful, just the wrong or harmful ones, going so far as to selectively quote Robert Anton Wilson on Holocaust denial leading to solipsism (pg. 7; I’m sure Wilson would’ve been honored) and going on about informational cascades and group polarization before dropping their delightful policy recommendations.

Here we suggest two concrete ideas for government officials attempting to fashion a response to such theories. First, responding to more rather than fewer conspiracy theories has a kind of synergy benefit: it reduces the legitimating effect of responding to any one of them, because it dilutes the contrast with unrebutted theories. Second, we suggest a distinctive tactic for breaking up the hard core of extremists who supply conspiracy theories: cognitive infiltration of extremist groups, whereby government agents or their allies (acting either virtually or in real space, and either openly or anonymously) will undermine the crippled epistemology of those who subscribe to such theories. They do so by planting doubts about the theories and stylized facts that circulate within such groups, thereby introducing beneficial cognitive diversity.

Sunstein & Vermeule, “Conspiracy Theories” 1-15-08, pg. 15

Not neurodiverstiy, yo, cognitive diversity. And stylized facts!

If you believe what you read on the internet, the Senate voted to confirm Sunstein’s nomination to the post of OIRA Administrator on 9-10-09; and, as of this writing, “CC: C and C” has been downloaded from SSRN’s site 9,119 times.

Coincidence?

Have fun and cuídate.