Archive for the ‘Pittsburgh’ Category

Adios, Colin Ward.

Saturday, February 27th, 2010

On learning of Colin Ward’s death (on 2-11, no less) via Roderick Long (whose blog I finally checked out [it's rad], drawn thither by a post on the forthcoming Barsoom movie), I recalled attending, a year or so past, an agora at the Roboto Project (also, in its current form anyhow, recently deceased) at which I rejoiced to snag a gnarly old copy of Anarchy in Action (aside from netstuff, the only Ward I’ve read). Having since laid it on a pal, I’ll pull some quotes from the ether.

First, Ward’s take on two perennial sources of contention (presumably, whoever transcribed this forgot to close parentheses and will have some explaining to do when the punctuation police come knockin’, but whatevs):

Power and privilege have never been known to abdicate. This is why anarchism is bound to be a call to revolution. But what kind of revolution? Nothing has been said in this book about the two great irrelevancies of discussion about anarchism: the false antitheses between violence and nonviolence and between revolution and reform. The most violent institution in our society is the state and its reacts violently to efforts to take away its power. (‘As Malatesta used to say, you try to do your thing and they intervene, and then you are to blame for the fight that happens.’ Does this mean that the effort should not be made? A distinction has to be made between the violence of the oppressor and the resistance of the oppressed.

Similarly, there is a distinction not between revolution and reform but on the one hand between the kind of revolution which installs a different gang of rulers or the kind of reform which makes oppression more palatable or more efficient, and on the other those social changes, whether revolutionary or reformist, through which people enlarge their autonomy and reduce their subjection to external authority.

Anarchism in all its guises is an assertion of human dignity and responsibility. It is not a programme for political change but an act of social self-determination.

from Anarchy in Action, via Revolution by the Book

This next bit I remember finding on the net in 2000, the year I came of age to franchise it up.  I was in my first, and penultimate, semester at a conservatory and my violin teacher (at length, in no uncertain terms, and in lieu of musical instruction) insisted it was my duty to vote for Bore/against Gush and that I was a Bad Person for not participating.  Had it not been for her obnoxiousness and our little disagreement, I might be a wretched liberal concert violinist today.

Seasoned non-voters take a different and longer-term view of history. They know that the similarities between the present government and both its predecessors and successors far outweigh the differences. They realise the truth of Kropotkin’s observation, 75 years ago, that ‘The state organisation, having been the force to which the minorities resorted for establishing and organising their power over the masses, cannot be the force which will serve to destroy these privileges.’ In urging the need for more popular, more decentralised, forms of social administration, he stressed that we will be compelled to find new forms of self-organisation for the social functions that the state fulfills through the bureaucracy, and that ‘as long as this is not done, nothing will be done.’

The non-voters will watch cynically as the politicians’ lies and promises mount and the government good-news machine rolls into action, quietly repeating the anarchist slogan :

‘If voting changed anything they’d make it illegal.’

from “The Case Against Voting” via Takver

Many of the man’s short works can be found here and there around the net (I keep finding more – this rad pdf includes Ward’s take on, among other things, Bey’s TAZ concept), tributes everywhere from The New Statesman to C4SS, Next Left to Reason.  Could be wrong, but I suspect, dear reader, that you haven’t read enough Colin Ward.

I know I haven’t.

Have fun and cuídate.

Unsettled

Friday, February 19th, 2010

At yesterday’s Google Book Settlement Fairness Hearing, 26 folks took the stand before Judge Chin – 21 said, “No fair!”, 5 said, “All’s fair in love, war and the transparent society.”  Those 5 were Howard U Law School’s Lateef Mtima, Sony’s Janet Cullum, National Federation of the Blind’s Marc Maurer, U of Michigan librarian Paul Courant and Center for Democracy and Technology’s John Morris (who has, like, some minor concerns, but still supports the settlement).  Predictably, the harshest criticism came not from Microsoft’s or Amazon’s representatives (guess this means no Googlezon, yeah?) but from EPIC‘ s.

Cindy Cohn, of the Electronic Privacy Information Center, represented 28 authors and publishers concerned with privacy issues. “The court is asked to approve a library/bookstore combination that has unlimited ability to track readers.” She said that the plaintiff’s supplemental brief says they agree with Cohn’s position, but offers no specifics on what the parties would do. Chin asked for clarification, pointing to the example of when he orders a book via Amazon, saying that he gets a message that says, “if you like this book, try this one.”  “Should I get concerned?” he asked.

Cohn said the ability “to track what you read is granular and continual.” Chin asked if it was fixable; Cohn responded that Google should be required to have a court order to turn over personal information to law enforcement officials. “This is a fight libraries and bookstores have fought,” she said. Later, she suggested Google should mitigate privacy concerns by deleting user data after 30 days.

***

Marc Rotenberg, of the Electronic Privacy Information Center, offered a more critical take on privacy than previous speakers. “I disagree that the problem can be cured.”

The settlement parties have untethered the privacy obligations that public libraries are subject to, he said. “There is simply no precedent for tracking people in this fashion,” he argued, citing processes like user authentication and watermarking.

Chin asked why it couldn’t be fixed. “It must be in the design of the technology,” Rotenberg said.

Objectors Outnumber Supporters in First Half of Google Settlement Fairness Hearing” by Norman Oder, Library Journal 2-18-10

Judge Chin said he’ll make a decision when he makes a decision.  More at ResourceShelf.

Also left in legal limbo yesterday was local violist Jordan Miles.

A hearing for a Homewood teen who claims three Pittsburgh police officers beat him during his arrest last month was postponed for a second time Thursday while the FBI and the city investigate the officers’ actions.

Attorney Kerry Lewis, who argued against the delay, said his client Jordan Miles is entitled to a timely hearing and asked District Judge Oscar Petite Jr. to dismiss his charges.

Mr. Miles, 18, is due in court March 4. He was charged with aggravated assault and resisting arrest in a Jan. 12 incident in which police said he was “sneaking around” a house on Tioga Street in Homewood with a heavy object in his coat that they thought was a gun.

Mr. Miles criminal complaint says he ran from plainclothes officers Richard Ewing, Michael Saldutte and David Sisak when they ordered him to stop and assaulted two of them. Police said object in his coat turned out to be a bottle of Mountain Dew, which Mr. Lewis denied Thursday.

Hearing on hold for teen who claims he was beaten” by Sadie Gurman, P-G 2-19-10
Whose criminal complaint?  Mr. Miles’, perhaps?  No police but punctuation police!
Have fun and – hang on, I’m getting a beep.

Switzerland of Bits, Currents of Change

Tuesday, February 16th, 2010

Via Technoccult,

On Tuesday, the Icelandic parliament is expected to introduce a measure aimed at making the country an international center for investigative journalism publishing, by passing the strongest combination of source protection, freedom of speech, and libel-tourism prevention laws in the world.

Supporters of the proposal say the move would make Iceland an “offshore publishing center” for free speech, analogous to the offshore financial havens that allow corporations to hide capital from authorities. Could global news organizations with a home office in Reykjavík soon be as common as Delaware corporations or Cayman Islands assets?

“This is a legislative package to create a haven for freedom of expression,” Icelandic member of parliament Birgitta Jónsdóttir confirmed to me, saying that a proposal for comprehensive media law reform will be filed in parliament on Tuesday, and that whistle-blowing specialists Wikileaks has been involved in drafting it.

Iceland aims to become an offshore haven for journalists and leakers” by Jonathan Stray, Nieman Journalism Lab, Harvard 2-11-10

Well, it sounds nice, but I’m kinda skeptical.  I mean, Wikileaks is cool and all, but what have they done for me lately, besides ask for money?  More at Wikileak.

As for Greenland, Woods Hole oceanographers recently announced that “subtropical waters” are melting the dang glaciers.  Via Watts,

Waters from warmer latitudes — or subtropical waters — are reaching Greenland’s glaciers, driving melting and likely triggering an acceleration of ice loss, reports a team of researchers led by Fiamma Straneo, a physical oceanographer from the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI).

“This is the first time we’ve seen waters this warm in any of the fjords in Greenland,” says Straneo. “The subtropical waters are flowing through the fjord very quickly, so they can transport heat and drive melting at the end of the glacier.”

***

“This is the first extensive survey of one of these fjords that shows us how these warm waters circulate and how vigorous the circulation is,” says Straneo. “Changes in the large-scale ocean circulation of the North Atlantic are propagating to the glaciers very quickly — not in a matter of years, but a matter of months. It’s a very rapid communication.”

Straneo adds that the study highlights how little is known about ocean-glacier interactions, which is a connection not currently included in climate models.

“We need more continuous observations to fully understand how they work, and to be able to better predict sea-level rise in the future,” says Straneo.

Team finds subtropical waters flushing through Greenland fjord” WHOI press release, 2-16-10

So, how much more ocean-glacier interaction data is needed before we can even begin to think about modeling that shit?  Given that the WHOI team based their conclusions on “two extensive surveys during July and September of 2008″ which Straneo says are the first of their kind, my guess is… a li’l’ bit more.

Have fun and cuídate.

Is it possible that no one has noticed…

Monday, February 15th, 2010

11-11-2009 = 15

2-15-2010 = 11

On 11-15-09, Kurt Nimmo covered Borghezio’s comments on PrisonPlanet.

You can see 317 to Borghezio’s right for most of the video, and 371 behind him in the final shot, for another 11-11 (or 1111 [15, as I mentioned elsewhere, in binary]).

It’s all true, yo!

Have fun and cuídate.

Love Stories

Sunday, February 14th, 2010

Liebe! Liebe! Liebe! ist die Seele des Genies.

Johann Caspar Lavater (b. 11-15-1741), Physiognomische Fragmente zur Beförderung der Menschenkenntnis und Menschenliebe

Well, that and a little occult knowledge…

Love is an essential part of the story of the 1,100-ton mansion created from Florida coral and limestone. There’s a staircase carved out from a single piece of rock, a sundial, the world’s largest carved heart and a coral hammered into the shape of Florida — complete with a small pond meant to represent Lake Okeechobee.

Built over many years beginning in the 1920s, the Coral Castle seems like something erected by the slaves who built the pyramids or whoever it was who constructed Stonehenge. But the Coral Castle was allegedly built by a single, sickly, skinny man named Edward Leedskalnin, who just wanted to impress the girl he loved in his native Latvia. As he waited for his Agnes to come back to him, Leedskalnin’s love apparently empowered him to move mountains.

“Two-hundred-eighty-three people who lived in Homestead signed a notarized affidavit saying this man built this castle at night, alone,” said Rusty McClure, who coauthored the book, The Mystery of Ed Leedskalnin and his American Stonehenge.

The museum notes that Leedskalnin had an acute sense of balance and movement, as if that somehow might be enough reason to understand how a five-foot-six, 100-pound man could erect a nine-ton door that can be pushed by a toddler.

Or how a man believed to have grade school-level education could create his own electricity generator and his own radio from old car parts. Or make a sundial that accounted for the changing of the seasons.

Leedskalnin died alone in 1951, and took the secret of the Coral Castle to his grave — saying only that he gained the power to build it through something called “magnetricity.” Just what that was has fascinated everyone from geologists to purveyors of the paranormal to McClure himself, whose book is listed in the genre of “unexplained phenomena.”

“We don’t know the how,” McClure said. “But we do know the why. This is a love story.”

Mysteries of love celebrated at mysterious Coral Castle” by Robert Samuels, Miami Herald 2-14-10

So who is Fulke Greville, and why is such an esteemed group of experts so convinced that he may be about to reveal extraordinary secrets from beyond the grave?

Greville, who was born in Stratford in 1554, ten years before Shakespeare’s official birth date, was without a doubt one of the most extraordinary men of his age.

Among a mind-boggling list of achievements he was a judge, a rear admiral in the Navy, an Army captain, an ‘intelligencer’ who travelled all over Europe recruiting spies for the Crown, a champion horseman, Queen Elizabeth’s favourite courtier and, in his latter years, Chancellor of the Exchequer under James I.

As far as Greville himself was concerned, however, his true calling was in the arts.

Indeed, his personal plea before his death in 1628 was that he wished ‘to be known to posterity under no other notions than of Shakespeare’s master’, according to a mid-17th century biography.

It is this claim, at once straightforward and obscure, which has led the historian A.W.L. Saunders to spend the past decade investigating Greville’s ties with Shakespeare.

In an exhaustive book, The Master Of Shakespeare, Saunders has identified 177 profile matches between the life and works of Fulke Greville and William Shakespeare.

These include that they lived in the same street, had the same friends, among them Christopher Marlowe and Francis Bacon, the same enemies and moved in the same literary circles.

Pointing out that Stratford-upon-Avon at the time had an adult male population of just 600, Mr Saunders argues that the chances of two men matching the same precise profile to such a degree are infinitesimal.

‘Fulke spent the equivalent of £300,000 today on it, but he is buried elsewhere,’ Saunders said this week.

‘No man would build something like that and leave it empty, but his body was placed in the crypt below the church, not in the monument itself.

‘What you have to recognise about Fulke is that he was not only a great statesman, he was also a trained and highly effective spy, and as such was been familiar with codes and secret symbols.

‘Ben Jonson referred to his friend William Shakespeare as “a monument without a tombe”, and that is exactly what we have in the Chapter House at St Mary’s.

‘In his writings, Fulke left clear hints that he wrote the play Antony And Cleopatra, and that he had given it “a far more honourable sepulture than it could ever have deserved”.’

Again we are drawn to this astonishing monument.

‘There is also a strong body of evidence to suggest that Fulke was a leading Rosicrucian – a member of an esoteric society of mystics whose symbol is a cross of roses.

Many tens of thousands of Masons hold the sincere belief that Fulke was the first Grand Master of the Rosicrucian order – and a sword placed on the monument appears to bear its Rose Cross symbol,’ explains Saunders.

While I’ve long been smitten with the group authorship theory centered around Bacon, and this may or may not turn out to be fresh ammo for the Anti-Stratfordians, whatever they find in there is bound to be interesting.
Love and do as you will and cuídate.