Great Deeds and Misdeeds

For the Ancient Greeks of Homer’s time, history had no intrinsic value; it was experienced as the recollection of myth. The myths of the gods, and later those of the heroes, formed so to speak those original events which were re-enacted in thousands of variations by people here on earth, and this “re-enactment” was known as history. History was thus no more and no less than the mortal imitation of divine myths. “When something should be decided among the humans,” — W. F. Otto has written of the ancient world view of the Hellenes — “the dispute must first take place between the gods” (quoted by Hübner, 1985, p. 131).

If, however, historical events, such as the Trojan War for example, developed an inordinate significance, then the boundary between myth and history became blurred. The historical incidents could now themselves become myths, or better the reverse, the myth seized hold of history so as to incorporate it and make it similar. For the ancient peoples, this “mythologizing” of history signified something very concrete — namely the direct intervention of the gods in historical events. This was not conceived of as something dark and mysterious, but rather very clear and contemporary: either the divinities appeared in visible human form (and fought in battles for instance) or they “possessed” human protagonists and “inspired” them to great deeds and misdeeds.

- Victor & Victoria Trimondi

More of Michael McParlane’s one-panels at

PoliticalCartoons.com

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Mixx
  • Blogosphere News
  • De.lirio.us
  • Fark
  • Internetmedia
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • Scoopeo
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati

Tags: , , ,

Leave a Reply