Posts Tagged ‘9-11’

Towering Leadership

Saturday, February 13th, 2010

Via TPM, Lockheed Martin’s WaPo ad/memorial is a real tear-jerking memory-jogger.

Adios, Murtha.

Have fun and cuídate.

Fiscal Restraint

Friday, February 12th, 2010

Office supplies, airport scanners, bailouts, bombs, black ops – all regrettable (esp. the office supplies) but necessary expenditures.  Still, you gotta draw the line somewhere.

The Obama administration stunned New York’s delegation yesterday, dropping the bombshell news that it does not support funding the 9/11 health bill.

The state’s two senators and 14 House members met with Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius just hours before President Obama implored in his speech to the nation for Congress to come together and deliver a government that delivers on its promises to the American people.

So the legislators were floored to learn the Democratic administration does not want to deliver for the tens of thousands of people who sacrificed after 9/11, and the untold numbers now getting sick.

“I was stunned — and very disappointed,” said Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, who like most of the other legislators had expected more of a discussion on how to more forward.

“To say the least, I was flabbergasted,” said Staten Island Rep. Mike McMahon.

The 9/11 bill would spend about $11 billion over 30 years to care for the growing numbers of people getting sick from their service at Ground Zero, and to compensate families for their losses.

Tough tardigrades, first responders.

Happy Lincoln’s birthday and cuídate.

UPDATE, 2-20-10

Conspiracy Theories: Causes and Cures

Sunday, January 24th, 2010

Declare the past, diagnose the present, foretell the future ; practise these acts. As to diseases, make a habit of two things–to help, or at least to do no harm.

Hippocrates, Epidemics I, Part XI, W.H.S. Jones trans.

“There’s no conspiracy.”

Jonathan Wilde in Ken MacLeod’s conspiracy-filled Fall Revolution series

Let us never tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories concerning the attacks of September the 11th – malicious lies that attempt to shift the blame away from the terrorists themselves, away from the guilty.

George W. Bush to UN General Assembly, 11-10-01

This can of worms has really made the rounds since Marc Estrin opened it (I caught it over at Cryptogon).  Basically, for the thoroughly modern malady of conspiracy theoryitis, OIRA’s Sunstein and co-author Vermeule prescribe… wait for it… conspiracy!

I have to admit, the dudes occasionally raise some interesting points.  For instance, I can recall (wonder how many of my fellow conspiracy geeks can say the same?) the transformative fury I felt upon learning of the Santa conspiracy.  I didn’t know to call it that at the time, but learning I’d been systematically lied to by my parents, and that such deception was no big deal to them, nor to any of the other adults with whom I raised the issue, led me to question  for the first time the religion in which I’d been raised – a path leading to the jovial cynicism I’ve enjoyed (with but the infrequent hiccup of outrage/indignation) for the past decade.  Thanks, Mom & Dad!

Not all false conspiracy theories are harmful; consider the false conspiracy theory, held by many of the younger members of our society, that a secret group of elves, working in a remote location under the leadership of the mysterious “Santa Claus,” make and distribute presents on Christmas Eve. This theory is false, but is itself instilled through a widespread conspiracy of the powerful – parents – who conceal their role in the whole affair. (Consider too the Easter Bunny and the Tooth Fairy.) It is an open question whether most conspiracy theories are equally benign; we will suggest that some are not benign at all.

Sunstein & Vermeule, “Conspiracy Theories” 1-15-08, pg. 5

Cass and Adrian want you to know that they know that, like, not all conspiracy theories are wrong or harmful, just the wrong or harmful ones, going so far as to selectively quote Robert Anton Wilson on Holocaust denial leading to solipsism (pg. 7; I’m sure Wilson would’ve been honored) and going on about informational cascades and group polarization before dropping their delightful policy recommendations.

Here we suggest two concrete ideas for government officials attempting to fashion a response to such theories. First, responding to more rather than fewer conspiracy theories has a kind of synergy benefit: it reduces the legitimating effect of responding to any one of them, because it dilutes the contrast with unrebutted theories. Second, we suggest a distinctive tactic for breaking up the hard core of extremists who supply conspiracy theories: cognitive infiltration of extremist groups, whereby government agents or their allies (acting either virtually or in real space, and either openly or anonymously) will undermine the crippled epistemology of those who subscribe to such theories. They do so by planting doubts about the theories and stylized facts that circulate within such groups, thereby introducing beneficial cognitive diversity.

Sunstein & Vermeule, “Conspiracy Theories” 1-15-08, pg. 15

Not neurodiverstiy, yo, cognitive diversity. And stylized facts!

If you believe what you read on the internet, the Senate voted to confirm Sunstein’s nomination to the post of OIRA Administrator on 9-10-09; and, as of this writing, “CC: C and C” has been downloaded from SSRN’s site 9,119 times.

Coincidence?

Have fun and cuídate.

Bicycle Diaries

Friday, January 15th, 2010

A crane fell here in Manhattan today as I type this.  It killed four by last count and smashed a neighboring building.  Another building went down two weeks ago, and the week before that part of a Trump building collapsed and a man was beheaded.

In the guise of uplift and progress, these buildings actually dehumanize people when they don’t kill them outright.  Although they are all made of identical materials – reinforced concrete, glass, and steel – they don’t soar and swoop like the interstate highways, dams, and bridges made of the same materials.  The graceful arcs of interchanges on the expressways and autobahns are not mirrored in these condo blocks.  Neither are they meant to last like those structures.  The future is here, in spirit, for an instant – but it will disappear, it will crumble, before our very eyes.

So instead of a small number of really impressive “monuments” such as those that survive from the disdained historical past, our century will leave, across the planet, a sprinkling of almost identical structures.  It is, in a way, one vast global conceptual monument, whose parts and pieces are spread across the world’s cities and suburbs.  One city, in many locations.

They’re doing it in New York right now.  All over town almost identical concrete and glass buildings are rising.  Many are going up so quickly that one wonders if the speed of construction isn’t just a way to get them up before anyone can object.  Now, with the credit/economic disaster in progress, the heat is truly on to spend any previously allocated money.  Some towers have the names of famous architects attached, others do not.  Visually it’s often hard to tell them apart – they are all, ultimately, designed by the developers, while the starchitect is simply another kind of logo that can be applied in an attempt to distinguish one building from the other.

I met David Byrne once in 2001, when he came through town to play a show and to promote The New Sins; and I recall my surprise when he rode up to the line snaking outside Jay’s Book Stall in Oakland on, of all the crazy things, a bicycle.  In his new book, anecdotes about biking in different places around the world (including Pittsburgh) are linked by musings on various topics and photos taken by Byrne and others (including Rudy Rucker, whose novel Hylozoic I reviewed recently).  It’s a fun read, particularly if you’re into Byrne or biking, music or design.  Thanks to Matt Bennett for the recommendation.

4/5 stars

Byrne begins the first chapter, on American cities, by summarizing the history of the modern city and pinning the blame for said abominations on Le Corbusier, Charlie Wilson, Robert Moses, and Hitler – or on misguided futurism, the military-industrial complex and the automobile – and compares the “built” landscape of Valencia, California to a film set, remarking that, “The mental dislocation is a wonderful feeling.”  This chapter also covers “The Return of Pittsburgh”, and Byrne writes of the Maxo Vanka murals at St. Nicholas church in Millvale, and of his most recent visit last year,

“It seems that Pittsburgh is more than just standing – the cultural district downtown is jumping on the weekend, the little neighborhoods are thriving with their corner bars and grocery stores, the strip district still has its booming markets and, I am told, folks are moving back into the city.”

Besides giving a tad too much credit to the Heinzes for the degree to which Pittsburgh is “thriving” (he acknowledges that the city is bankrupt, the idiocy of the stadiums, etc.) he seems to grok what’s cool about it.  Not much on cycling here, other than to note it’s “a challenge” due to “the hills that are everywhere”.  True ‘nuff, but I’d still rather bike around here than Manhattan (where Byrne lives), which cycling scene he goes on about at length in the final chapter.

Bicycle Diaries really is all over the place.  The Istanbul chapter, for instance, contains the above-quoted bit about the crane and dehumanizing buildings.  In the Argentina chapter (mostly concerned with regional musical styles/audiences vs. global ones), he writes of a dog park, the design of which he admires, in Manhattan “at Twenty-third Street and Eleventh Avenue”, and in the Manila chapter, rather critically, of written language (seems Byrne’s been reading Burroughs, whose “policeman inside” he also riffs on in the London chapter).  In the San Francisco chapter, he discusses Bohemian Grove, the Beats, the links between the psychedelic and infotech movements, and his first time there,

“in the early ‘70s, lured by the hippie eco techno worldview embodied by the Whole Earth Catalog. I joined a friend in an attempt to build a dome in a field up in Napa County.  I eventually lost focus on the dome project and ended up busking with another friend on the streets of Berkeley – he played accordion, I played violin and ukulele and struck ironic poses.  It was successful.  I realized that at that time I was more interested in irony than utopia.”

A visit to Oakland’s Creative Growth, “a visual arts center for people who are mentally and/or psychologically challenged” fuels a rant on outsider art (“Social functionality, to me, is the key word in the inside/outside dichotomy, not sanity.”) and the problem of evaluating creations independently from their creators (“If we opt to denigrate Speer’s monumental architecture then there are a whole lot of other architects who, judging by the way their work looks, are equally ‘Fascist,’ and many of them are working today.”).  In the New York chapter, he describes a power outage and weighs in on 9-11 echoes in E.B. White’s 1949 essay “Here Is New York”. The semi-hyperstitional passage he cites is,

“A single flight of planes no bigger than a wedge of geese can quickly end this island fantasy, burn the towers, crumble the bridges, turn the underground passages into lethal passages, cremate the millions.”

Byrne goes on to say,

Now, with the atomic bomb especially, as White points out, that protective aspect of what a city is has been turned upside down.

But, he notes, just as this shadow begins to loom over great mixtures of humanity like New York, an institution, the UN, is rising to attempt to put an end to this threat.  Death and hope simultaneously, as always.

While I can’t join Byrne or White in investing any hope in the UN, I can totally get behind what the former says in the next paragraph regarding the Freedom Tower One World Trade Center,

The new World Trade Center is being built atop a thirty-story concrete windowless bunker.  A monument to fear – a symbolic return to a medieval mind-set and walled cities.  Even though we are united and connected in so many new ways, some are still building massive walls and fortifications that won’t really protect us from anyone determined and clever enough.  Walls and concrete barricades aren’t really an effective means of protection these days – nothing is, really.  All that interconnectedness that facilitated much of the explosion of megawealth over the last decade also facilitated the interpenetration of everything, so that no one or no building is truly isolated and “safe” anymore.  Safety is in getting along.

as well as his take on the “Rules of the Road” (in short, “Follow ‘em!”).  Byrne closes with an interview with Janette Sadik-Khan, New York’s transportation commissioner, on getting around the city a century from now, a quotation from Enrique Peñalosa’s “The Politics of Happiness”, and some sketches of his bike rack designs which have been implemented around NYC.

Bonus points for turning me on to Peñalosa, The Life of Birds and Juana Molina.

Find yourself a city to bike in, happy reading and cuídate.

Ground Zero

Thursday, November 19th, 2009

You weren’t paranoid if people were really out to get you, but she couldn’t be sure.  If the wrong people were reading her posts, they might – might – care.  And if they did care, they might – might – want to stop her.

If they thought she was a threat.

A big if.  Who frequented these Web sites besides weirdos and nutcases?  But the weirdos and nutcases were onto something.  They were ninety percent right about everything except who and why.  They were pointing fingers in the wrong directions.

Everything was either political or religious or cultural to them.  They couldn’t see that the real reasons were much darker, more sinister, and more dangerous and threatening than their wildest nightmare scenarios.

Only one man was listening – or at least not dismissing her as a kook as were most of the others.

When the kooks think you’re a kook, maybe it’s time to reassess your position.

No.  Not when you’re sure you’re right.

And she was sure.  Well, pretty sure.  As sure as you could be about these things when–

There.  He’d looked at her again.  Her gut tingled with alarm.  No question: He was watching her.

The latest novel (and the first I’ve read) in F. Paul Wilson’s popular Repairman Jack series, Ground Zero is a supernatural thriller dealing with 9-11 conspiracy research.  I tried to restrain myself, but I couldn’t not read it, nor can I now recommend it, unless you’re already into the series.  Spoilers.

Rating: 3/5 stars

Set in an alternative present, Ground Zero asks the reader to suspend her disbelief regarding an ancient book from the “First Age”, the text of which “changes into the reader’s native language”, a lady (“The Lady”) and her dog, not human and canine but “embodiments” of the noosphere, and a Zoroastrian-flavored “cosmic shadow war waged out of sight and influencing everything”.  Done, done, and done.  But the reader is also asked to swallow the following conspiracy narrative: that “Al Qaeda” operatives (sans CIA, ISI, or other intelligence agency/government involvement, but funded and manipulated instead by a secret society called the Septimus Order, evidently a big player in the Repairman Jack mythos) flew planes into the Twin Towers, which were then brought down by conventional controlled demolition (the book opens with a shadowy figure [one of the villains from the Order] pressing a black button to detonate the South Tower and musing how, “No one, absolutely no one, would guess – or be allowed to guess – the truth behind the who and the why of this day.”)  Our hero’s childhood pal Weezy hazards some guesses, and lil’ puzzle pieces like insider trading, Raytheon and “Rebuilding America’s Defenses” are briefly discussed, along with the notion (though Wilson doesn’t come right out and say it) that the event functioned, at least in part, as mass ritual sacrifice, with higher-ups of the Order “soaking up the pain, panic, terror, fear, grief, anguish, and dismay, feasting on it.”  For me, having spent some time in the labyrinth of competing and complementary conspiratorial/occult interpretations of 9-11, the Septimus Order’s scheme (of opening a gateway to Lovecraftian weirdness that will transform the world in a really unpleasant way [props to Wilson for linking 9-11 to pillars and portals and all, but he keeps it literal, not symbolic; in other words, he's no Jake Kotze]) seemed superfluous, more amusing than (presumably Wilson’s intention) terrifying.  While I’m equally suspicious of the official CT narrative, those emanating from the capital-T “9/11 Truth” camp, and those from researchers rather farther afield, I’m convinced that “the truth behind the who and the why of this day”, whatever it may be, is for shizzle stranger, and more interesting, than this particular piece of fiction, in which the most banal of 9-11 CT is trotted out, superficially presented, and ultimately used as a lead-in to the “real” conspiracy of the Septimus Order.  Still, it’s competently written, and not having read any of the other Repairman Jack books, I was able to follow along just fine.  Ground Zero doesn’t quite stand on its own as a satisfying thriller, but as a late entry in a long series it isn’t meant to, and Wilson is up front about that.  If you’re into the series, then, go for it; if you’re into researching 9-11 anomalies, your time will be better spent doing just that, and doing it well, rather than reading Ground Zero.

Sorry.

Happy reading and cuídate.