Posts Tagged ‘Control’

Unsettled

Friday, February 19th, 2010

At yesterday’s Google Book Settlement Fairness Hearing, 26 folks took the stand before Judge Chin – 21 said, “No fair!”, 5 said, “All’s fair in love, war and the transparent society.”  Those 5 were Howard U Law School’s Lateef Mtima, Sony’s Janet Cullum, National Federation of the Blind’s Marc Maurer, U of Michigan librarian Paul Courant and Center for Democracy and Technology’s John Morris (who has, like, some minor concerns, but still supports the settlement).  Predictably, the harshest criticism came not from Microsoft’s or Amazon’s representatives (guess this means no Googlezon, yeah?) but from EPIC‘ s.

Cindy Cohn, of the Electronic Privacy Information Center, represented 28 authors and publishers concerned with privacy issues. “The court is asked to approve a library/bookstore combination that has unlimited ability to track readers.” She said that the plaintiff’s supplemental brief says they agree with Cohn’s position, but offers no specifics on what the parties would do. Chin asked for clarification, pointing to the example of when he orders a book via Amazon, saying that he gets a message that says, “if you like this book, try this one.”  “Should I get concerned?” he asked.

Cohn said the ability “to track what you read is granular and continual.” Chin asked if it was fixable; Cohn responded that Google should be required to have a court order to turn over personal information to law enforcement officials. “This is a fight libraries and bookstores have fought,” she said. Later, she suggested Google should mitigate privacy concerns by deleting user data after 30 days.

***

Marc Rotenberg, of the Electronic Privacy Information Center, offered a more critical take on privacy than previous speakers. “I disagree that the problem can be cured.”

The settlement parties have untethered the privacy obligations that public libraries are subject to, he said. “There is simply no precedent for tracking people in this fashion,” he argued, citing processes like user authentication and watermarking.

Chin asked why it couldn’t be fixed. “It must be in the design of the technology,” Rotenberg said.

Objectors Outnumber Supporters in First Half of Google Settlement Fairness Hearing” by Norman Oder, Library Journal 2-18-10

Judge Chin said he’ll make a decision when he makes a decision.  More at ResourceShelf.

Also left in legal limbo yesterday was local violist Jordan Miles.

A hearing for a Homewood teen who claims three Pittsburgh police officers beat him during his arrest last month was postponed for a second time Thursday while the FBI and the city investigate the officers’ actions.

Attorney Kerry Lewis, who argued against the delay, said his client Jordan Miles is entitled to a timely hearing and asked District Judge Oscar Petite Jr. to dismiss his charges.

Mr. Miles, 18, is due in court March 4. He was charged with aggravated assault and resisting arrest in a Jan. 12 incident in which police said he was “sneaking around” a house on Tioga Street in Homewood with a heavy object in his coat that they thought was a gun.

Mr. Miles criminal complaint says he ran from plainclothes officers Richard Ewing, Michael Saldutte and David Sisak when they ordered him to stop and assaulted two of them. Police said object in his coat turned out to be a bottle of Mountain Dew, which Mr. Lewis denied Thursday.

Hearing on hold for teen who claims he was beaten” by Sadie Gurman, P-G 2-19-10
Whose criminal complaint?  Mr. Miles’, perhaps?  No police but punctuation police!
Have fun and – hang on, I’m getting a beep.

Bicycle Diaries

Friday, January 15th, 2010

A crane fell here in Manhattan today as I type this.  It killed four by last count and smashed a neighboring building.  Another building went down two weeks ago, and the week before that part of a Trump building collapsed and a man was beheaded.

In the guise of uplift and progress, these buildings actually dehumanize people when they don’t kill them outright.  Although they are all made of identical materials – reinforced concrete, glass, and steel – they don’t soar and swoop like the interstate highways, dams, and bridges made of the same materials.  The graceful arcs of interchanges on the expressways and autobahns are not mirrored in these condo blocks.  Neither are they meant to last like those structures.  The future is here, in spirit, for an instant – but it will disappear, it will crumble, before our very eyes.

So instead of a small number of really impressive “monuments” such as those that survive from the disdained historical past, our century will leave, across the planet, a sprinkling of almost identical structures.  It is, in a way, one vast global conceptual monument, whose parts and pieces are spread across the world’s cities and suburbs.  One city, in many locations.

They’re doing it in New York right now.  All over town almost identical concrete and glass buildings are rising.  Many are going up so quickly that one wonders if the speed of construction isn’t just a way to get them up before anyone can object.  Now, with the credit/economic disaster in progress, the heat is truly on to spend any previously allocated money.  Some towers have the names of famous architects attached, others do not.  Visually it’s often hard to tell them apart – they are all, ultimately, designed by the developers, while the starchitect is simply another kind of logo that can be applied in an attempt to distinguish one building from the other.

I met David Byrne once in 2001, when he came through town to play a show and to promote The New Sins; and I recall my surprise when he rode up to the line snaking outside Jay’s Book Stall in Oakland on, of all the crazy things, a bicycle.  In his new book, anecdotes about biking in different places around the world (including Pittsburgh) are linked by musings on various topics and photos taken by Byrne and others (including Rudy Rucker, whose novel Hylozoic I reviewed recently).  It’s a fun read, particularly if you’re into Byrne or biking, music or design.  Thanks to Matt Bennett for the recommendation.

4/5 stars

Byrne begins the first chapter, on American cities, by summarizing the history of the modern city and pinning the blame for said abominations on Le Corbusier, Charlie Wilson, Robert Moses, and Hitler – or on misguided futurism, the military-industrial complex and the automobile – and compares the “built” landscape of Valencia, California to a film set, remarking that, “The mental dislocation is a wonderful feeling.”  This chapter also covers “The Return of Pittsburgh”, and Byrne writes of the Maxo Vanka murals at St. Nicholas church in Millvale, and of his most recent visit last year,

“It seems that Pittsburgh is more than just standing – the cultural district downtown is jumping on the weekend, the little neighborhoods are thriving with their corner bars and grocery stores, the strip district still has its booming markets and, I am told, folks are moving back into the city.”

Besides giving a tad too much credit to the Heinzes for the degree to which Pittsburgh is “thriving” (he acknowledges that the city is bankrupt, the idiocy of the stadiums, etc.) he seems to grok what’s cool about it.  Not much on cycling here, other than to note it’s “a challenge” due to “the hills that are everywhere”.  True ‘nuff, but I’d still rather bike around here than Manhattan (where Byrne lives), which cycling scene he goes on about at length in the final chapter.

Bicycle Diaries really is all over the place.  The Istanbul chapter, for instance, contains the above-quoted bit about the crane and dehumanizing buildings.  In the Argentina chapter (mostly concerned with regional musical styles/audiences vs. global ones), he writes of a dog park, the design of which he admires, in Manhattan “at Twenty-third Street and Eleventh Avenue”, and in the Manila chapter, rather critically, of written language (seems Byrne’s been reading Burroughs, whose “policeman inside” he also riffs on in the London chapter).  In the San Francisco chapter, he discusses Bohemian Grove, the Beats, the links between the psychedelic and infotech movements, and his first time there,

“in the early ‘70s, lured by the hippie eco techno worldview embodied by the Whole Earth Catalog. I joined a friend in an attempt to build a dome in a field up in Napa County.  I eventually lost focus on the dome project and ended up busking with another friend on the streets of Berkeley – he played accordion, I played violin and ukulele and struck ironic poses.  It was successful.  I realized that at that time I was more interested in irony than utopia.”

A visit to Oakland’s Creative Growth, “a visual arts center for people who are mentally and/or psychologically challenged” fuels a rant on outsider art (“Social functionality, to me, is the key word in the inside/outside dichotomy, not sanity.”) and the problem of evaluating creations independently from their creators (“If we opt to denigrate Speer’s monumental architecture then there are a whole lot of other architects who, judging by the way their work looks, are equally ‘Fascist,’ and many of them are working today.”).  In the New York chapter, he describes a power outage and weighs in on 9-11 echoes in E.B. White’s 1949 essay “Here Is New York”. The semi-hyperstitional passage he cites is,

“A single flight of planes no bigger than a wedge of geese can quickly end this island fantasy, burn the towers, crumble the bridges, turn the underground passages into lethal passages, cremate the millions.”

Byrne goes on to say,

Now, with the atomic bomb especially, as White points out, that protective aspect of what a city is has been turned upside down.

But, he notes, just as this shadow begins to loom over great mixtures of humanity like New York, an institution, the UN, is rising to attempt to put an end to this threat.  Death and hope simultaneously, as always.

While I can’t join Byrne or White in investing any hope in the UN, I can totally get behind what the former says in the next paragraph regarding the Freedom Tower One World Trade Center,

The new World Trade Center is being built atop a thirty-story concrete windowless bunker.  A monument to fear – a symbolic return to a medieval mind-set and walled cities.  Even though we are united and connected in so many new ways, some are still building massive walls and fortifications that won’t really protect us from anyone determined and clever enough.  Walls and concrete barricades aren’t really an effective means of protection these days – nothing is, really.  All that interconnectedness that facilitated much of the explosion of megawealth over the last decade also facilitated the interpenetration of everything, so that no one or no building is truly isolated and “safe” anymore.  Safety is in getting along.

as well as his take on the “Rules of the Road” (in short, “Follow ‘em!”).  Byrne closes with an interview with Janette Sadik-Khan, New York’s transportation commissioner, on getting around the city a century from now, a quotation from Enrique Peñalosa’s “The Politics of Happiness”, and some sketches of his bike rack designs which have been implemented around NYC.

Bonus points for turning me on to Peñalosa, The Life of Birds and Juana Molina.

Find yourself a city to bike in, happy reading and cuídate.

Peter Watts’ Border Imbroglio

Sunday, December 20th, 2009

Via Making Light,

From Cory Doctorow on Boing Boing: Dr. Peter Watts, Canadian science fiction writer, beaten and arrested at US border.

I already linked to this from the sidebar, but on reflection, I have a little more to say.

First, it’s worth noting that comment #2 to the Boing Boing post observes “And now the inevitable ‘we don’t know the whole story so we shouldn’t pass judgments but he probably did something to provoke them’ comments can commence.” Indeed, there seems to be a kind of person who makes it their business to hover around at sites like Boing Boing or Consumerist to explain that probably the police had no choice but to beat up that guy, or that we don’t know that Wal-Mart abused that customer, since after all it’s her word against theirs. And indeed, comment #5 shows up right on schedule: “It’s my observation that most of these cases begin with a person who becomes belligerent when asked to do something he doesn’t want to do (get out of the car, step away from the car, etc.) These officers may very well have overstepped their bounds, but I doubt very seriously that Watts is completely innocent.”

For what it’s worth, I don’t know exactly what happened, but a couple of things seem pretty evident to me. One is that this wasn’t a routine border search. Rather, American border guards in Port Huron, Michigan demanded to search Watts’s car as he was leaving the US for his native Canada. This is very squirrelly. We’re conducting exit searches now?

Another is that Peter Watts is, as Charlie Stross observes, the kind of person who’s extraordinarily unlikely to throw the first punch, as Watts is being accused of having done.

The final thing I want to note is a comment to John Scalzi’s post on the matter, from one-time Watts co-author Derryl Murphy, who says:

Part of me rolls my eyes at Peter for being the person he is, climbing out of the car to question these yahoos. But the smarter part of me realizes that because of people like Peter, we have someone who can push back at the bullshit the first time so that the rest of us don’t get the shit kicked out of us when we finally get tired of it all and push back as well.

And that’s why I’m donating to Watts’s defense fund.UPDATE: Watts on what happened:

Along some other timeline, I did not get out of the car to ask what was going on. I did not repeat that question when refused an answer and told to get back into the vehicle. In that other timeline I was not punched in the face, pepper-sprayed, shit-kicked, handcuffed, thrown wet and half-naked into a holding cell for three fucking hours, thrown into an even colder jail cell overnight, arraigned, and charged with assaulting a federal officer, all without access to legal representation (although they did try to get me to waive my Miranda rights. Twice.). Nor was I finally dumped across the border in shirtsleeves: computer seized, flash drive confiscated, even my fucking paper notepad withheld until they could find someone among their number literate enough to distinguish between handwritten notes on story ideas and, I suppose, nefarious terrorist plots. I was not left without my jacket in the face of Ontario’s first winter storm, after all buses and intercity shuttles had shut down for the night.In some other universe I am warm and content and not looking at spending two years in jail for the crime of having been punched in the face.

Peter Watts, distinguished Canadian SF writer, arrested by US border police while trying to re-enter Canada” by Patrick Nielsen Hayden, Making Light 12-11-09

Watts came to my attention a few years back for taking to task Margaret Atwood (whose SF, particularly her latest, I greatly admire) regarding her obnoxious snootiness.  Read his short fiction and essays on Rifters.com and see if you feel like PayPaling him a few bucks to help him fight the law and win.  I’ve spoken to Daniel from the Cyberpunk Apocalypse about throwing a benefit reading for Watts sometime in January.

Have fun and cuídate.

UPDATE 12-24-09

No, I did not testify on the 22nd. Yes, it went well — so well, in fact, that I actually wondered if the whole thing might end then and there, despite having been told that it never does. It didn’t, of course; but I learned that, thanks to so many of you, I do in fact have a good lawyer. And the prosecution chose not to show any surveillance footage of the alleged offence. Draw your own conclusions.

Infinite Regression” by Peter Watts, Rifters 12-24-09

COP15, 25^2

Thursday, December 10th, 2009

(CNN) — The largest-ever gathering of climate protesters will assemble in Copenhagen this week for the long-awaited COP15 summit, raising the prospect of clashes with authorities as they attempt to highlight their concerns to world leaders.

With up to 50,000 protesters expected to arrive over the 11-day conference, their activities are likely to be as much of a focus as the discussions on climate change taking place within the heavily-guarded venue.

Climate protesters descend on Copenhagen” by George Webster, 12-7-09 CNN

As always, it’s nice to see 11 and 15 snuggling up.  If C=3, o=15, and P=16, 3+1+5+1+6=13=4, 3+15+16=34=7, 13+15=4×7=28=10=1, 1+3+1+5=10=1, 34+15=7^2=49=13=4, 3+4+1+5=13=4, and 4+7=11, 7+10=17, 10+13=23, 49+28=77, etc.  And for the denialists who maintain there’s no link between the climate circus and 9-11, check this truly bizarre (what’s with the conditional “would be”, the lowercase “ipcc”?) announcement from the IPCC website:

** For important maintenance reasons, the ipcc website would be unavailable Thursday December 10th between 9pm and 11pm CET. We apologize for the inconvenience. **

Straw-grasping numerology aside, the first significant numbers from COP15 are the Danish text (for a final straw-grasp, dig how the first letters of “Haiti” and “Guyana” sum to 15)

The so-called Danish text, a secret draft agreement worked on by a group of individuals known as “the circle of commitment” – but understood to include the UK, US and Denmark – has only been shown to a handful of countries since it was finalised this week.

The agreement, leaked to the Guardian, is a departure from the Kyoto protocol’s principle that rich nations, which have emitted the bulk of the CO2, should take on firm and binding commitments to reduce greenhouse gases, while poorer nations were not compelled to act. The draft hands effective control of climate change finance to the World Bank; would abandon the Kyoto protocol – the only legally binding treaty that the world has on emissions reductions; and would make any money to help poor countries adapt to climate change dependent on them taking a range of actions.

The document was described last night by one senior diplomat as “a very dangerous document for developing countries. It is a fundamental reworking of the UN balance of obligations. It is to be superimposed without discussion on the talks”.

A confidential analysis of the text by developing countries also seen by the Guardian shows deep unease over details of the text. In particular, it is understood to:

• Force developing countries to agree to specific emission cuts and measures that were not part of the original UN agreement;

• Divide poor countries further by creating a new category of developing countries called “the most vulnerable”;

• Weaken the UN’s role in handling climate finance;

• Not allow poor countries to emit more than 1.44 tonnes of carbon per person by 2050, while allowing rich countries to emit 2.67 tonnes.

Developing countries that have seen the text are understood to be furious that it is being promoted by rich countries without their knowledge and without discussion in the negotiations.

“It is being done in secret. Clearly the intention is to get [Barack] Obama and the leaders of other rich countries to muscle it through when they arrive next week. It effectively is the end of the UN process,” said one diplomat, who asked to remain nameless.

Copenhagen climate summit in disarray after ‘Danish text’ leak” by John Vidal, The Guardian 12-8-09

this epic silliness from the EPA, which exists in a conceptual vacuum and bears no relation to COP15 or to anything else,

The recent decision by the EPA that carbon dioxide is a “threat to human health” has garnered praise at the Copenhagen Climate Conference, even as certain European countries demand that the United States do more to curb “green house gasses.”

Obama administration officials are claiming that President Obama still prefers to prefer to address carbon emissions through the legislative process. Obama administration officials claim that the EPA announcement and the opening of the Copenhagen Climate Conference are “coincidental.”

Critics of climate change legislation are having none of it, though. Hot Air Allahpundit suggests that the EPA , in declaring carbon dioxide a “threat to human health” has reserved onto itself the power to regulate almost every aspect of human life and commerce in the United States, bypassing the Congress, and in effect grabbing unprecedented power for the federal government.

Copenhagen Climate Conference Praises EPA Carbon Dioxide Decision” by Mark Whittington, AC 10-8-09

Copenhagen’s mayor vs. the city’s sex workers,

PROSTITUTES IN Copenhagen, who were anticipating a bumper trade during the UN climate summit, have reacted angrily to an official attempt to blacklist them.

The city’s mayor, Ritt Bjeregaard, who is a former EU environment commissioner, has circulated postcards to the city’s 150-plus hotels urging them to advise guests not to patronise prostitutes during their stay. “Be sustainable – don’t buy sex” was the message.

Now, the Sex Workers Interest Group has hit back by saying that its members, all of whom operate legally, would offer free sex to any participant in the conference, on production of the offending postcard and their “COP 15” badge.

“This is sheer discrimination. Ritt Bjerregaard is abusing her position as mayor in using her power to prevent us carrying out our perfectly legal job. I don’t understand how she can be allowed to contact people in this way,” spokeswoman Susanne Møller said.

She said it was reprehensible and unfair of the city’s political leaders to be using the UN climate summit as a platform to conduct a campaign against sex workers.

Prostitutes raise temperatures at Copenhagen climate summit” by Frank McDonald, Irish Times 12-4-09

and the continuation of G-20 Pittsburgh-style precrime obnoxiousness.

According to a Climate Justice Action (CJA) spokesperson Tannie Nyboe, some 200 policemen entered a building next to their accommodation at around 3am on Wednesday morning, and searched for weapons. “It became clear quite soon that they couldn’t find what they were looking for.” Instead, said Nyboe, the police confiscated a number of tools which the protesters said were for putting up tents, as well as a number of posters with CJA schedules printed on them.

Copenhagen Police described the seized tools as ‘the most peculiar tools we’ve ever seen’. At a press meeting the police showed off shields, balloons filled with paint, and wire cutters.

“This organization might have attracted people with another view on how to demonstrate,” said Henrik Suhr, spokesperson for Copenhagen Police. He refused to disclose how the police knew about the tools. “We have our ears and eyes, and we’re running our own investigations,” was all he would say.

The raid has angered CJA: “It was really intimidating to be woken up by police coming in and searching through the building. I think this gives a very bad impression of the Danish police to all our international friends,” said Nyboe.

Police confiscate ‘weapons’ during night raid” by Sjoerd Klumpenaar, The COP15 Post 12-10-09

Also, Barakhenaton blamed war tomorrow on losing the CC war today in his latest infomercial,

There is little scientific dispute that if we do nothing, we will face more drought, more famine, more mass displacement — all of which will fuel more conflict for decades.  For this reason, it is not merely scientists and environmental activists who call for swift and forceful action — it’s military leaders in my own country and others who understand our common security hangs in the balance.

Remarks by the President at the Acceptance of the Nobel Peace Prize“, The White House 12-10-09

all of which leads me to suspect that, naughty or nice, free humanity will get Shafted As Usual/Like Never Before, in addition to lumps of coal (truly a “dirty” energy source, though not because of CO2), in our metaphorical stockings, a full week before the 25th.

On that note, I hit up the opening of 25 Squared (25 artists, 25 pieces, each 5″ or smaller, each, including fully immersive moss-scapes, a mobil, and paintings of, among other things, some cute, cartoonish tripods) at Fe Gallery, which was rad, but too packed to scope out the often minutely-detailed pieces properly.  I recommend checking it out some quiet afternoon.

Keep warm, stay cool and cuídate.

Through the Climategate

Saturday, December 5th, 2009
In light of the University of East Anglia email hacking fiasco being christened “Climategate“, Jake Kotze’s observation that “The poster for Al Noah’s documentary features what can be interpreted as three pillarmids emitting a stargate vortex reminiscent of the 1st degree Masonic tracing board and the 9-11 megaritual,” bears repeating.

Synchromystic insight, or, if you like, apophenia, aside, even freaking George Monbiot has been wagging his finger and calling for Phil Jones to resign (surprisingly, Jones has stepped down as CRU director, at least until this independent investigation is completed sometime in the spring; Penn State’s Michael “Hockeystick” Mann, not so much).  But whatevs, the dang data’s the thing, and UEA has promised to drop all the CRU data which, you know, for whatever reason, they’ve been keeping to themselves, “in the interests of research transparency when we have the necessary agreements.”

‘Til then, The Devil’s Kitchen has some thought-provoking analysis and heated comments threads, with contributions from the like of Dissecting Antismokers’ Brains author Michael J. McFadden, comparing CRU’s statistical monkey business with that commonplace in his field of investigation, and SF author Neal Asher.  Also, E.M. Smith has been analyzing the Goddard Institute for Space Studies temperature data and come up with some comparably mind-melting stuff.

But the show must still go on and something must still be done, and what’s being done to prepare for Copenhagen echoes Pittsburgh’s preparations for the G-20.

The Danish parliament today passed legislation which will give police sweeping powers of “pre-emptive” arrest and extend custodial sentences for acts of civil disobedience. The “deeply worrying” law comes ahead of the UN climate talks which start on 7 December and are expected to attract thousands of activists from next week.

Under the new powers, Danish police will be able to detain people for up to 12 hours whom they suspect might break the law in the near future. Protesters could also be jailed for 40 days under the hurriedly drafted legislation dubbed by activists as the “turmoil and riot” law. The law was first announced on 18 October.

The Danish ministry of justice said that the new powers of “pre-emptive” detention would increase from 6 to 12 hours and apply to international activists. If protesters are charged with hindering the police, the penalty will increase from a fine to 40 days in prison. Protesters can also be fined an increased amount of 5,000 krona (671 Euros) for breach of the peace, disorderly behaviour and remaining after the police have broken up a demonstration.

Denmark approves new police powers ahead of Copenhagen” by Felicity Carus, Guardian 11-26-09

Props once again to the hacker(s)/whistleblower(s) of Climategate and to all scientists humbly trying to sort out what the dickens is actually happening.  See yinz on the other side.

If you’re heading to Copenhagen to protest something or other, or are just trying to stay warm and entertained on the internet, have fun and cuídate.