Posts Tagged ‘Council on Foreign Relations’

Yukking it up at CFR Pandemic Influenza Symposium

Friday, November 13th, 2009

COHEN: Then should we mandate for children?

(Laughter.)

COHEN: We do for school entry. Individual states do for school entry. Why don’t we do that to protect the population? And we know that protecting our children from the vaccine, if they are indeed ten times more infectious —

MONTO: A very brief answer which covers a lot of problems with influenza vaccine and we’ve heard it brought up already and that is, a lot of our problems with mandating influenza vaccine, use of influenza vaccine, would go away if we didn’t have the need for annual vaccination. I mean, we’ve got a different kind of vaccine here, and I think we need to recognize the difference between influenza vaccine the way it’s used and the fact that it’s a good vaccine.

It’s not a great vaccine. We’ve shown in a recent study 70 percent efficacy of the live vaccine in healthy adults young adults, who should have the best efficacy. We need, as we’ve heard, a better vaccine.

COHEN: Well, it’s an interesting question, though. Would you be against mandating?

SIMONSEN: Well, I think this is very interesting because, I mean, especially for the health-care worker example. I mean, there are many, many good reasons why health care workers should be considering immunization for their own safety but also to protect and, first, do no harm to the patients that they are treating. Having said that, does it work to mandate?

I think what would work better would be to say that there was a shortage and people tend to buy more of something that’s in demand. (Laughter.) We saw that — there was one season where, really, people lined up all night to get a flu shot.

COHEN: Right.

SIMONSEN: And I mean —

COHEN: Well, there is shortage.

SIMONSEN: No, actually, because we thought we were going to need two doses for every adult and since we are – only one dose, so, actually, we have twice as many doses and enough for the whole population at this point, I understand.

COHEN: But it’s not there today, so –

SIMONSEN: Right, right. But I mean, that’s –

COHEN: You had a question. You’ve been waiting a long time. And please identify yourself.

Jon Cohen, Arnold Monto and Lone Simonsen, from Session I of a Council On Foreign Relations Symposium on Pandemic Influenza: Science, Economics and Foreign Policy, 10-16-09 (streaming video & audio also available)

How else do I know she was talking out of school? All you have to do is look at what’s happened in Canada. 50 million vaccine doses were ordered for a population of 33 million, but we are told there is a shortage, and the excuse given is that the sole source, GlaxoSmithKline, has to focus at the moment on non-adjuvanted vaccines – for special purposes, like the military. The general population, of course, gets the adjuvanted kind.

I heard this with my own ears on a CPAC broadcast of the emergency Parliamentary session on Swine Flu held on Monday evening (Nov. 2) – and the CBC confirms it:

“GlaxoSmithKline overestimated their ability to produce the adjuvanted vaccine while they focus on unadjuvanted vaccine” …

But do you remember the video that the Sun dumped as quickly as it published it, and we had to look elsewhere to find it? It said that the vaccine has arrived in two separate vials, one containing vaccine, another containing adjuvant – and the two had to be mixed by the jabbers themselves, which is why the line-ups moved so slowly.

CFR confirms vaccine shortage in Canada is a lie!“, YayaCanada 11-4-09

YayaCanada links to False Flag Flu, which drops the phrase “Swine-Eleven”.  Nice!

Have fun and cuídate.

Mass Meditation for Peace, Obama’s speech, Michael Froman press conference

Friday, September 25th, 2009

by Jessica Silver

9-25-09 G20 Playground North Side

9-25-09 G20 North Side, photo by Jessica Silver

9-5-09 North Side Zombies, Jessica Silver

Free Tibet activists, North Side

This morning I attended the Mass Meditation for Peace on Flagstaff Hill in Oakland.  If you haven’t participated in an outdoor mass meditation before, I highly recommend it.

The attendees meditated to the chanting song of two Mayan elders. Later, 15 Burmese monks walked around the people meditating, encircling them and saying prayers.

Sarah Bauer, a therapist from the Pittsburgh Center for Complementary Health and Healing, organized the event with the aid of others associated with the Thomas Merton Center, which helps coordinate the efforts of various activists in Pittsburgh.

She said the message came from a Vietnamese Zen master whose philosophy was “peace in oneself, peace in the world.”

Meditation, she said, allows for people to feel silence and peace within themselves, to pray for change they want to see and then “have it emanate out.”

The Pitt News

I talked with Sarah walking down Flagstaff Hill to the unfortunately punctuated Peoples’ March.

9-25-09 sarah bauer, mass meditation for peace

For all my dilettantish enthusiasm for consciousness studies and all things esoteric, my actual meditation chops, never great to begin with, have been pretty rusty lately.  The presence of so many others proficient in the art helped me slough some attention-rust this morning, whether or not the consciences of any nation-state puppet heads or central banker puppeteers kicked in as a result.  The synergy, alignment, harmonization and oneness the globalists prattle on about, abusing these terms as euphemisms for centralized control, refer to real processes and states (pardon) of being; you just need to turn down the prattle a bit in order to experience them.

Thanks to everyone present this morning for facilitating this.

Now, with regard to the prattle,

But words are still the principal instruments of control. Suggestions are words. Persuasions are words. Orders are words. No control machine so far devised can operate without words, and any control machine which attempts to do so relying entirely on external force or entirely on physical control of the mind will soon encounter the limits of control.

Burroughs, “The Limits of Control” 1978

I showed up at 5:15 at the August Wilson Center for a 5:30 press conference with Michael Froman, courtesy of G20 Voice.  Froman was late, so I ended up watching Barakhenaton address his subjects and the world, an activity I can’t recommend to non-fans of gallows humor.  As expected, and as I scribbled onto a Three Rivers Community Foundation G-20 Guide, he patted Himself & co. on the collective back, declaring that, “Our coordinated stimulus plans played an indispensable role in averting catastrophe,” and that, “We can’t wait for a crisis to cooperate,” and that, “… we will continue our stimulus efforts until our people are back to work,” as no-frills serfs, and that, “I’ve called for a new era of engagement that yields real results for our people — an era when nations live up to their responsibilities, and act on behalf of our shared security and prosperity,” which apparently includes “a new World Bank Trust Fund” and throwing the IMF $500 billion more with which to wreak its usual usurious havoc.  He also announced that we have, like, a Coalition of the Willing Iran-wise, and that, “… with respect to the military, I’ve always said that we do not rule out any options when it comes to U.S. security interests.”  I refrained from giggling throughout the news conference, but admit I nearly lost it when he said, “We went into Afghanistan not because we were interested in entering that country or positioning ourselves regionally, but because al Qaeda yada yada,” then bragged about how, “… the minute I came into office we initiated a review, and even before that review was completed, I ordered 21,000 additional troops into Afghanistan.”  Still, not a chuckle from any of the journalists assembled in the August Wilson Center, not even when he said of protesters, “They object to free markets.  One of the great things about the United States is, is that you can speak your mind and you can protest; that’s part of our tradition. But I fundamentally disagree with their view that the free market is the source of all ills,” then began his next sentence with the adverb “ironically”.  He also reassured those with climate concerns that the fossil fuel subsidy reform maybe kinda hashed out over the past two days will “… help us combat the threat posed by climate change,” and that the G-20 is “… acting to address the threat posed by climate change.”  Thanks, guys!  Though Obama did use the phrase, “global economic cooperation and governance” once and “new framework” three times, he at least showed restraint in not mentioning “9/11,” “anarchy”, “freedom” and “the planet Krypton”.

At 6pm, Obama’s old college chum, former President and CEO of CitiInsurance,

Senior Council on Foreign Relations Fellow and now Deputy Assistant to the President and Deputy National Security Adviser for International Economic Affairs, Michael Froman dropped by to take bloggers’ questions, all of which were climate-related (and answered with the same vague commitments to do something somehow, at some point, moving forward, but cautiously), save mine, which pertained to central bank and G-20 secrecy.    Froman basically responded there was no time for the G-20 to discuss trifles like central banks submitting to audits and “coming clean”, as Obama insisted Iran do about their nuke program, and that the G-20 isn’t secret because, look, I’m here talking to you, Obama just said a bunch of stuff, and a lovely Leaders’ Statement was issued summarizing all the stuff the G-20 discussed in secret.  There were many cameras in the room, and I was assured the press conference was being recorded, so I decided to save batteries on my mp3 recorder and not take any notes.  Of course, now the only media I can find of this thing are some flickr photos and a blog post about his responses to some of the climate questions.  Until video or audio corroboration surfaces, you’ll just have to take my word, or not, that Froman conveyed what I said he conveyed, much as we’re asked to take on faith what was and was not discussed in the sanctum sanctorum of the Convention Center.  As above, so below, I suppose.

Awful stuff went down in Oakland yesterday after I hightailed it to Fe Gallery,

but, as of 11:11 Friday, far as I know, no one in this city has been directly killed by either the G-20 or their Starship Troopers.  Obviously, that’s not saying much.

Just glad I can say it.

Abide in loving awareness, get your story out there and cuídate.

UPDATE 9-26-01

Jessica Silver dropped by today with the footage and photos she shot and which currently inhabit this and the previous post.  If you liberate them, please give her credit.

how we should think about the future

Tuesday, July 21st, 2009

If you hear any noise

It’s just me and the boys

George Clinton, “The Mothership Connection”

Thank you very much, Richard, and I am delighted to be here in these new headquarters. I have been often to, I guess, the mother ship in New York City, but it’s good to have an outpost of the Council right here down the street from the State Department. We get a lot of advice from the Council, so this will mean I won’t have as far to go to be told what we should be doing and how we should think about the future.

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, CFR Foreign Policy Address 7/15/09

Chemtrails en el Aire

Wednesday, April 29th, 2009

WASHINGTON (AP) — The president’s new science adviser said Wednesday that global warming is so dire, the Obama administration is discussing radical technologies to cool Earth’s air.

John Holdren told The Associated Press in his first interview since being confirmed last month that the idea of geoengineering the climate is being discussed. One such extreme option includes shooting pollution particles into the upper atmosphere to reflect the sun’s rays. Holdren said such an experimental measure would only be used as a last resort.

“It’s got to be looked at,” he said. “We don’t have the luxury of taking any approach off the table.”

***

But Holdren noted that shooting particles into the air — making an artificial volcano as one Nobel laureate has suggested — could have grave side effects and would not completely solve all the problems from soaring greenhouse gas emissions. So such actions could not be taken lightly, he said.

Still, “we might get desperate enough to want to use it,” he added.

AP 4/8/09

After Holdren’s comments hit the net, he was quick to clarify, “Relax, dudes, it was just, like, an idea, okay?“  Nearly a year ago, the CFR brought in CMU’s Jay Apt and M. Granger Morgan for a Workshop on Unilateral Planetary Scale Geoengineering to discuss such ideas; last month, Granger also contributed to this Foreign Affairs article, which concludes, “It is time to take geoengineering out of the closet-to better control the risk of unilateral action and also to know the costs and consequences of its use so that the nations of the world can collectively decide whether to raise the shield if they think the planet needs it.”

If this tech is just “on the table” being debated by think tankers, that’s one thing; but if, rather, it’s in the sky being sprayed by tankers, I’d say that’s a whole different bucket of spiders.  As for the nations of the world collectively deciding stuff, this tends to happen clandestinely.  Maybe what Morgan is getting at is some kind of digital open global referendum…

_ Geoengineer my ass (the planet needs it)!

_ Don’t chemtrail me, bro!

Then Al Gore or whoever can declare that more people picked “Geoengineer my ass”, so “the shield” shall be raised by popular mandate… even though it appears it already has been.


“It’s a nuisance to you and I to determine what’s real and what’s not.”

Innit, though?

Thanks We Are Change Pittsburgh and Your Inner Vagabond for the free public screening of Aerosol Crimes yesterday.  The next movie night is May 27, so check their calendar in few weeks to find out what’s playing.

CHEMICAL CHORDS

There’s still no official video for Beck’s track “Chemtrails“, but there is one by Luca Maximilian for Iris Aneas‘ “Chemtrails en el Aire” which I really like.

Here’s a provisional translation of Aneas’ lyrics:

So much time believing that what we see

is composed of water and steam,

but perhaps it is not true

and there is something hidden,

some lines that could be deadly

in the sky/heaven and diagonally,

a network that expands through the air

and kills the sun in the end.

Today I am sad because

there are chemtrails in the air

and I think on my balcony,

Where is the blue sky?

Is it not depraved what is made

before us in broad daylight?

It isn’t all the same to me

to watch it in my city.

Look and verify it,

look and verify it,

some lines that could be deadly

in the sky/heaven and diagonally.

Above they say

they are testing the aerosol

but it kills the sun in the end.

I believed it was a simple plane

like a naïve fish in the sea

that found a shark

and the naïve one has been me.

Today I am sad because

there are chemtrails in the air

and nobody knows it

and I cry from my balcony,

Where is the blue sky?

Something like that.

The Calderón quip at the end of the video (A quién le daña el saber, homicida es de si mismo.) translates to something like, “One who harms knowledge is the same as a murderer.”

Cheers, Iris!

¡Cuídate!

Richard Haass on Colbert Report

Wednesday, February 18th, 2009

CFR president Richard Haass talks about his toys.

Haass quips, “A lot of globalization isn’t fun.”

Amen, and then some.  But what is fun?

And for whom?

Are you having fun now, or playing Control’s zero-fun game?

What’s the most fun you’ve ever had?

And what fresh, novel fun could you have in the future?

Any futurological speculation or Utopian planning which neglects the concept of fun is, IMHO, baloney.  Control is inherently anti-fun because it uses fear (fun’s antithesis) to move its little “toys” around the holographic game board it projects.  Even when it casts itself as pro-fun, Control in effect says, “Do my awful bidding, else no fun for you,” using the fear of not-fun to get what it wants: your energy.

But if fun is fun (Aristotle) and not-fun is also fun (Buddha) and the fun you take is equal to the fun you make (me), then Control’s dire ultimatum becomes absurdly… funny.

Expand your concept of fun and be/have/make fun no matter what.

Sow the wind with fun today and reap the fun-filled whirlwind tomorrow.Choose fun constantly and instantiate your highest/best/most intense fun immediately.

Play and cuídate.